I was poised to have my first date in a very long time. This guy interested me. The first time that's happened in many years. He is a doctor who lives simply, thereby seeming to fit both my sexual and worldview fantasies. We arranged to meet for coffee near my apartment.
I got all dolled up because I like to look good when I meet someone. I pulled out my black heels, my fitted black skirt, a robin's-egg-blue top, black suit jacket, moonstone necklace, and dangly abalone earrings. I put on mascara, eye shadow, and blush. I even practiced walking about in the heels for good measure.
An hour before we were to meet, my date called and canceled. He didn't feel like going out and was more interested in staying home and relaxing with his dog than meeting me. He wondered if we could postpone our meeting. Yes, we sure can--indefinitely.
So now I am relaxing at home with my dog. He was groomed today, so he's especially cute. And he never stands me up.
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Three Days Without Rasputin
Aaron has been working seven days a week for months, but this weekend he took off on a camping trip with his new girlfriend. At the last minute, they decided to take Rasputin with them, so I've been sans dog buddy since Thursday afternoon.
Rasputin is so much a part of my life now that it is very strange to be without him. And yet for decades I survived somehow without a cute, little dog. How did I do it!
Rasputin is so much a part of my life now that it is very strange to be without him. And yet for decades I survived somehow without a cute, little dog. How did I do it!
Yet Another Example of Dehumanizing Corporate Double Speak
Every two weeks I have to call Baxter, the dialysis supply company, to place my next order. About a month ago I noticed that there was a new recorded message that played while I was on hold:
"We want to process your order as efficiently as possible. If you are calling to stop or suspend your dialysis supplies or to request a cycler pickup, you do not need to provide an explanation or reason."
Whenever I'm confronted with such careful language, I wonder, "What is the subtext here?" Clearly, the only reason someone would discontinue supply deliveries and no longer need the dialysis machine (a.k.a. cycler) would be one of the following:
1. She received a transplant.
2. She switched to hemodialysis.
3. She died.
4. She is discontinuing dialysis because she can no longer take living like this anymore. She is in fact ending her life by discontinuing treatment.
So then the question becomes "Why can't the clerk hear this information?" If the patient did in fact receive a transplant, why wouldn't the clerk want to share in the patient's boundless joy? If the patient were switching to hemodialysis (the kind of dialysis that is administered at a clinic by technicians, not at home by the patient), that wouldn't require much more than a sentence of explanation. Hardly something that would thwart efficiency. So, it must be that the order clerks are uncomfortable with hearing reasons 3 and 4.
I asked the clerk who took my order about the new message. At first she talked of efficiency, but then she worked around to saying the same thing as I had thought, only putting the onus on the family of the deceased--they are the ones, not the clerks, who are uncomfortable.
Isn't it too bad that we live in a society in which we buffer ourselves from such basic human interactions! What a much healthier country this might be if we looked at death, not hid it away like it was an unforgiveable social stigma that we might catch! How wonderful if a grieving family or a hopeless dialysis patient could receive a kind word from an order clerk. Who knows, that little interchange of kindness could possibly give the patient a ray of hope and she might reconsider #4.
You never know how you touch people, but you must first touch. More and more we live in a world in which we build walls that prevent connection or make it incredibly awkward. That's why, at every turn, dehumanizing corporate double speak has to be called out, challenged, and recognized for what it is--dehumanizing.
"We want to process your order as efficiently as possible. If you are calling to stop or suspend your dialysis supplies or to request a cycler pickup, you do not need to provide an explanation or reason."
Whenever I'm confronted with such careful language, I wonder, "What is the subtext here?" Clearly, the only reason someone would discontinue supply deliveries and no longer need the dialysis machine (a.k.a. cycler) would be one of the following:
1. She received a transplant.
2. She switched to hemodialysis.
3. She died.
4. She is discontinuing dialysis because she can no longer take living like this anymore. She is in fact ending her life by discontinuing treatment.
So then the question becomes "Why can't the clerk hear this information?" If the patient did in fact receive a transplant, why wouldn't the clerk want to share in the patient's boundless joy? If the patient were switching to hemodialysis (the kind of dialysis that is administered at a clinic by technicians, not at home by the patient), that wouldn't require much more than a sentence of explanation. Hardly something that would thwart efficiency. So, it must be that the order clerks are uncomfortable with hearing reasons 3 and 4.
I asked the clerk who took my order about the new message. At first she talked of efficiency, but then she worked around to saying the same thing as I had thought, only putting the onus on the family of the deceased--they are the ones, not the clerks, who are uncomfortable.
Isn't it too bad that we live in a society in which we buffer ourselves from such basic human interactions! What a much healthier country this might be if we looked at death, not hid it away like it was an unforgiveable social stigma that we might catch! How wonderful if a grieving family or a hopeless dialysis patient could receive a kind word from an order clerk. Who knows, that little interchange of kindness could possibly give the patient a ray of hope and she might reconsider #4.
You never know how you touch people, but you must first touch. More and more we live in a world in which we build walls that prevent connection or make it incredibly awkward. That's why, at every turn, dehumanizing corporate double speak has to be called out, challenged, and recognized for what it is--dehumanizing.
So Much of my Life is Outside the Bounds of Small Talk
Yesterday I had my first date in about six months. Because I go on so few dates and in general have so few opportunities to dress up, I had fun getting cute for this deli date. A fitted black skirt, a robin's-egg-blue top, a diaphonous scarf tied about my waist, dangly abalone earrings, and black heels no less!
Martin is a psychologist working in teen suicide intervention. Before going back to school in the early '90s, he was a successful painting contractor in San Diego. I admire people who follow their heart and make a radical shift to fulfill their dreams. He sure seemed to draw a lot of meaning and satisfaction from his work.
Near the end of lunch, I congratulated him on his conversation skills. I told him that it is rare to meet a person who knows how to ask questions, listen for the answers, and yet reveal something of himself. Usually I meet people who either can't hold up their end of the conversation and I end up interviewing them or they monopolize the conversation and don't ask anything of me. It was refreshing to meet an exception to that rule.
Martin is a psychologist working in teen suicide intervention. Before going back to school in the early '90s, he was a successful painting contractor in San Diego. I admire people who follow their heart and make a radical shift to fulfill their dreams. He sure seemed to draw a lot of meaning and satisfaction from his work.
Near the end of lunch, I congratulated him on his conversation skills. I told him that it is rare to meet a person who knows how to ask questions, listen for the answers, and yet reveal something of himself. Usually I meet people who either can't hold up their end of the conversation and I end up interviewing them or they monopolize the conversation and don't ask anything of me. It was refreshing to meet an exception to that rule.
Throughout lunch, however, I was occasionally aware that I had to clip my answers so as not to reveal too much. Later, as I was driving home, I realized how much of my current life is outside the bounds of small talk. For example, let's start with a big topic of conversation on a first date--career. I can't say that I retired from Cal State last year because that would prompt questions of "Why?" and "Aren't you too young for retirement?" Honest answers to these queries would mean I'd have to say something about dialysis and heart surgery.
And I held back at other junctures too. Martin said he swims several times a week. I love to swim but cannot do so now, as the risk of infection at my dialysis exit site is too great. So I just smiled, nodded my head, and said something like, "That's fantastic."
Martin talked about his family of origin, then asked if my parents were still alive. I said they were not. He asked other questions, and so I told him that I had moved my mother here from Wisconsin to watch over her during the last two years of her life, but that, that had been difficult. I couldn't explain why it had been difficult though because that again would have entailed a discussion of my health. The stress and physical strain of moving her to California prompted a heart attack the very day after I settled her in at her assisted living facility. That was just the first in a series of dozens of medical emergencies I experienced while simultaneously caring for all her needs and her finances, working several jobs, and tending to my household duties. I really don't know how I outlived her.
I didn't get the feeling from Martin's parting comments that he was interested in seeing me again, so I won't have to be concerned about keeping dialysis, diabetes, and heart disease from him. And as I have so few dates, I may not have to face this sort of situation for another six months, maybe longer, maybe never again. I'll just have to find other opportunities to wear heels!
Saturday, August 07, 2010
Diet Soda and the Quick Path to Depression
For many, many years, I was a six-pack-of-Tab-a-day gal. (Tab, for those of you who missed the '80s, was and still is--if you can find it--the precursor of Diet Coke.) I loved the stuff. I was addicted to it.
Starting about two decades ago, my use began to taper off due to a number of events: frequent solo camping trips into remote areas where there were few stores, none of which carried Tab; four years of living in Northern California, again where any kind of soda, diet or not, was rare; and a news report about how a subsidiary of Coke was murdering union leaders at its South American plants. The last one really got to me,even more so than the knowledge of the harm Diet Coke (since Tab was now difficult to find even in large urban areas) was doing to my body: gas bubbles in the intestinal track, dissolution of bones, alteration of the body chemistry, and depression. In fact, aspertame, the sweetening agent in diet drinks, has been linked to at least 92 symptoms and diseases.
Since a small child, I had been depressed, so I can't blame it all on diet sodas, but I often wonder, now that I've almost completely kicked the habit, how much of my adult depression was due to aspertame, more commonly known under its brand name of Nutrasweet. (Tab, for the record, was sweetened with saccharine, which has its own troubles.)
Every once in a while, I will say, "Oh, I can buy just one six pack of Diet Coke. That won't be a problem." This is alcoholic thinking--Oh, sure, I can just have one drink. This week I gave that a try. I bought six 16-ounce bottles of Diet Coke on Tuesday and had one as soon as I got home. The next morning, at cardiac rehab, the Bette Midler song "The Rose" came on the radio, and I began to cry. No one saw my tears, thank God, but I had trouble keeping my act together during my workout. I was very depressed, seemingly for no reason, since, strangely enough, "The Rose" had played during my workout on Monday and it had not affected me. I must admit that during all my years of Tab consumption, many songs made me cry and feel blue. Once again, I was knocked over the head with the message that diet drinks are a killer.
If you're wondering how such a dangerous substance was ever approved by the FDA, well, I've got one word for you--Rumsfeld, who was the CEO of the chemical company Searle Laboratories, which held the patent on aspertame and was taken over by the evil seed company Monsanto, which is attempting to ruin every farmer who refuses to use genetically modified seed. The FDA had previously banned aspertame because studies had linked it to brain tumors, but Donald Rumsfeld, who became the secretary of defense under Bush II, pushed some buttons. The FDA panel that was assembled to investigate aspertame reached a deadlock, whereupon FDA commissioner Arthur Hull Hayes cast the deciding vote. This man went on to take a high-level position with the PR giant Burston-Marsteller, which, oh my gawsh, had Monsanto as a major client.
Please, everyone who reads this, if you didn't know about aspertame prior to this, spread the message, espeically to parents who give their preeschoolers Diet Cokes! They're killing their kids.
Starting about two decades ago, my use began to taper off due to a number of events: frequent solo camping trips into remote areas where there were few stores, none of which carried Tab; four years of living in Northern California, again where any kind of soda, diet or not, was rare; and a news report about how a subsidiary of Coke was murdering union leaders at its South American plants. The last one really got to me,even more so than the knowledge of the harm Diet Coke (since Tab was now difficult to find even in large urban areas) was doing to my body: gas bubbles in the intestinal track, dissolution of bones, alteration of the body chemistry, and depression. In fact, aspertame, the sweetening agent in diet drinks, has been linked to at least 92 symptoms and diseases.
Since a small child, I had been depressed, so I can't blame it all on diet sodas, but I often wonder, now that I've almost completely kicked the habit, how much of my adult depression was due to aspertame, more commonly known under its brand name of Nutrasweet. (Tab, for the record, was sweetened with saccharine, which has its own troubles.)
Every once in a while, I will say, "Oh, I can buy just one six pack of Diet Coke. That won't be a problem." This is alcoholic thinking--Oh, sure, I can just have one drink. This week I gave that a try. I bought six 16-ounce bottles of Diet Coke on Tuesday and had one as soon as I got home. The next morning, at cardiac rehab, the Bette Midler song "The Rose" came on the radio, and I began to cry. No one saw my tears, thank God, but I had trouble keeping my act together during my workout. I was very depressed, seemingly for no reason, since, strangely enough, "The Rose" had played during my workout on Monday and it had not affected me. I must admit that during all my years of Tab consumption, many songs made me cry and feel blue. Once again, I was knocked over the head with the message that diet drinks are a killer.
If you're wondering how such a dangerous substance was ever approved by the FDA, well, I've got one word for you--Rumsfeld, who was the CEO of the chemical company Searle Laboratories, which held the patent on aspertame and was taken over by the evil seed company Monsanto, which is attempting to ruin every farmer who refuses to use genetically modified seed. The FDA had previously banned aspertame because studies had linked it to brain tumors, but Donald Rumsfeld, who became the secretary of defense under Bush II, pushed some buttons. The FDA panel that was assembled to investigate aspertame reached a deadlock, whereupon FDA commissioner Arthur Hull Hayes cast the deciding vote. This man went on to take a high-level position with the PR giant Burston-Marsteller, which, oh my gawsh, had Monsanto as a major client.
Please, everyone who reads this, if you didn't know about aspertame prior to this, spread the message, espeically to parents who give their preeschoolers Diet Cokes! They're killing their kids.
Saturday, July 31, 2010
Spoken Like a Happy Slave of the Totalitarian State
During my recent trip to France, I was questioned, patted down, and searched every time I went through airport security in Los Angeles, Newark, Halifax, Montreal, and Paris. My luggage was opened and thoroughly examined, and my dialysis machine was dusted for drugs. I got so incredibly tired of going into a back room with two butch gals and having to pull up my shirt and pull down my pants so that they could gawk at my dialysis tubing and insulin pump.
Finally, in Halifax, I said something like this to two security gals: "I would almost be OK with this invasion of privacy if the whole terrorist bullshit was real. But it's all made up. The U.S. government was behind 9/11 so that it could control people like this." Without skipping a beat, the more senior of the two said that though that may be true, it has given her and a lot of other people jobs.
Oh, my gawd! Is that what it's really all about! Three wars, tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of lives lost, millions of people maimed or disturbed for life, millions of others grieving or destitute, the wholesale trashing of the Constitution and of truth, the further tightening of the police state, the incarceration of thousands without charge and without trial, the torture of countless others, the waste of $3 trillion--but, hey, I've got a job.
I said nothing in reply. This woman is living on another planet and in a different dimension. We do not have the necessary touchdown points to discuss this matter.
When I told a sympathetic someone about this incident, he said I was lucky, that I could have been whisked away and never heard from again. He's right. I'm sure that would have happened had I said this in the "land of the free" rather than in Canada.
Finally, in Halifax, I said something like this to two security gals: "I would almost be OK with this invasion of privacy if the whole terrorist bullshit was real. But it's all made up. The U.S. government was behind 9/11 so that it could control people like this." Without skipping a beat, the more senior of the two said that though that may be true, it has given her and a lot of other people jobs.
Oh, my gawd! Is that what it's really all about! Three wars, tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of lives lost, millions of people maimed or disturbed for life, millions of others grieving or destitute, the wholesale trashing of the Constitution and of truth, the further tightening of the police state, the incarceration of thousands without charge and without trial, the torture of countless others, the waste of $3 trillion--but, hey, I've got a job.
I said nothing in reply. This woman is living on another planet and in a different dimension. We do not have the necessary touchdown points to discuss this matter.
When I told a sympathetic someone about this incident, he said I was lucky, that I could have been whisked away and never heard from again. He's right. I'm sure that would have happened had I said this in the "land of the free" rather than in Canada.
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
9/11 Deja Vu
The mainstream media are now saying that most of the 3.5-5 million gallons of BP-spilled oil has evaporated. When I heard that on the top of the hour today, I thought, "What! Do they really think we're that stupid!" But of course they do--the American public bought the official 9/11 story hook, line, and sinker, even though it, too, defies physics and logic. (And in the case of 9/11, the logistical capability of Al-Qaeda. The media are now saying that Al-Qaeda has "scaled down" its operations since 9/11, only choosing to do much more modest suicide bombings. Oh my gawd! The reason why they're doing small potatoes jobs is because that's all they've ever been capable of doing!)
But back to the BP oil. BP used dispersants, how much dispersants is not known, to break up the oil. Dispersants are not without their side effects, as wildlife and human swimmers and clean-up personnel have been experiencing internal hemorraging. But of course the government says there's no health problems associated with the oil spill, just like the government said the area around Ground Zero posed no health problems for residents and first responders. But now we know differently. Firefighters, cops, volunteers, and residents of NYC are suffering horrific respiratory problems from breathing in the air following the collapse of three huge buildings. (Yes, folks, remember to count Building 7 of the World Trade Center complex, the one the government doesn't want to talk about because it too pancaked though it was not hit by a plane. Hmmmm...interesting, but not interesting enough for any mainstream journalist to investigate.)
And, folks, oil does not spontaneously evaporate from the ocean. C'mon! Yes, gasoline spilled on a sidewalk will evaporate, but that's not what we're talking about here. Crude oil is so much heavier and more viscous than gasoline. And much of it was below the surface, and things don't evaporate if they're below the surface!
Another government-media lie. They just keep them coming.
Here's another: that the 92,000 or so secret documents leaked to wikileaks and then presented to the New York Times, the Guardian, and der Spiegel put American soldiers in danger and jeopardize national security. Let's take the last one first. Whenever the government is caught with its pants down, it cries national security. It's like a criminal saying that putting him on trial would endanger society. It's the government, after all, that is shown to be guilty of war crimes in these documents. And the reporters who printed stories about some of the documents did so without revealing the names of those who are still in the field.
The young man who leaked the documents, Pfc. Bradley Manning, is being held in a Kuwait prison and is facing up to 52 years for exposing the truth. Obama the candidate said he would make things easier for whistleblowers, that they should not be treated like criminals but like heroes. But Obama the president is singing a much different tune because now he's the one at the helm, responsible for the war crimes that are currently underway in Afghanistan and Iraq.
I have sent a donation to Manning's defense fund, and I urge you to do the same. I have also written him a letter, thanking him for his bravery. The sad thing to me is that in this country we are not hearing about the war crimes. Instead, journalists just keep repeating the government's line that this has endangered national security. The so-called land of the free is so tightly controlled. You'll just have to get your news by reading the Guardian or der Spiegel.
But back to the BP oil. BP used dispersants, how much dispersants is not known, to break up the oil. Dispersants are not without their side effects, as wildlife and human swimmers and clean-up personnel have been experiencing internal hemorraging. But of course the government says there's no health problems associated with the oil spill, just like the government said the area around Ground Zero posed no health problems for residents and first responders. But now we know differently. Firefighters, cops, volunteers, and residents of NYC are suffering horrific respiratory problems from breathing in the air following the collapse of three huge buildings. (Yes, folks, remember to count Building 7 of the World Trade Center complex, the one the government doesn't want to talk about because it too pancaked though it was not hit by a plane. Hmmmm...interesting, but not interesting enough for any mainstream journalist to investigate.)
And, folks, oil does not spontaneously evaporate from the ocean. C'mon! Yes, gasoline spilled on a sidewalk will evaporate, but that's not what we're talking about here. Crude oil is so much heavier and more viscous than gasoline. And much of it was below the surface, and things don't evaporate if they're below the surface!
Another government-media lie. They just keep them coming.
Here's another: that the 92,000 or so secret documents leaked to wikileaks and then presented to the New York Times, the Guardian, and der Spiegel put American soldiers in danger and jeopardize national security. Let's take the last one first. Whenever the government is caught with its pants down, it cries national security. It's like a criminal saying that putting him on trial would endanger society. It's the government, after all, that is shown to be guilty of war crimes in these documents. And the reporters who printed stories about some of the documents did so without revealing the names of those who are still in the field.
The young man who leaked the documents, Pfc. Bradley Manning, is being held in a Kuwait prison and is facing up to 52 years for exposing the truth. Obama the candidate said he would make things easier for whistleblowers, that they should not be treated like criminals but like heroes. But Obama the president is singing a much different tune because now he's the one at the helm, responsible for the war crimes that are currently underway in Afghanistan and Iraq.
I have sent a donation to Manning's defense fund, and I urge you to do the same. I have also written him a letter, thanking him for his bravery. The sad thing to me is that in this country we are not hearing about the war crimes. Instead, journalists just keep repeating the government's line that this has endangered national security. The so-called land of the free is so tightly controlled. You'll just have to get your news by reading the Guardian or der Spiegel.
Monday, July 26, 2010
Getting Things Done
Yesterday I completed a 270+-page writing project. Today I paid off my mortgage. Tomorrow I complete my first ceramics class. This is certainly a time of getting things done.
I bought a three-bedroom, 1 3/4 bath ranch house in Yucca Valley in November 2004, just before the housing market went south. Fortunately, I did not pay top dollar, so the value has only gone down about $13K. It took me until June of 2005 to get it ready for a tenant. At the time I evicted her a year later, she was behind six months' rent, plus she left a mess that took more than $1,000 to clean up. And she left all the faucets running for the last month she was in the place, so I was socked with a $500 water bill! But the tenants I have in there now are great.
My first loan payment was in January of 2005, so that means I paid off the loan in just 5 1/2 years. The "personal banker" at B of A said that in six years with the bank, he has only seen two other pay-offs. That sure says something about Americans and their debt.
Add to my very unusual pay-off a credit score of 801 and no credit card or other debt, and you'd think lenders would be fighting over me. But even someone like me can't get a new loan. My income is too low.
I am so happy I no longer have to deal with Bank of America, the evil beast, one of the big robbers of the U.S. Treasury in the bankers' bailout. My loan was originally with some small company that sold it to Countrywide, and then when Countrywide went belly up, B of A took over.
I'm hoping that this roll of accomplishments will continue. There are a lot of things I would love to see finished and done with. On the top of that list put dialysis!
I bought a three-bedroom, 1 3/4 bath ranch house in Yucca Valley in November 2004, just before the housing market went south. Fortunately, I did not pay top dollar, so the value has only gone down about $13K. It took me until June of 2005 to get it ready for a tenant. At the time I evicted her a year later, she was behind six months' rent, plus she left a mess that took more than $1,000 to clean up. And she left all the faucets running for the last month she was in the place, so I was socked with a $500 water bill! But the tenants I have in there now are great.
My first loan payment was in January of 2005, so that means I paid off the loan in just 5 1/2 years. The "personal banker" at B of A said that in six years with the bank, he has only seen two other pay-offs. That sure says something about Americans and their debt.
Add to my very unusual pay-off a credit score of 801 and no credit card or other debt, and you'd think lenders would be fighting over me. But even someone like me can't get a new loan. My income is too low.
I am so happy I no longer have to deal with Bank of America, the evil beast, one of the big robbers of the U.S. Treasury in the bankers' bailout. My loan was originally with some small company that sold it to Countrywide, and then when Countrywide went belly up, B of A took over.
I'm hoping that this roll of accomplishments will continue. There are a lot of things I would love to see finished and done with. On the top of that list put dialysis!
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Question to the U.S. Military: Would You Shoot Americans?
A number of loose ends have come together in my consciousness in the last several hours. Obesity. Poor education. The pharmaceutical industry. TV. Internet. Sports teams. Illegal aliens. The Second Amendment. UN troops on American soil. Prison camps. The granting of U.S. citizenship to illegals if they serve in the military. Substance abuse. Seemingly unrelated subjects, but I'm beginning to see a plan.
First off, let me state that I have never been a gun owner. I have always felt that guns caused more problems than they solved. But I am also a person whose mind is open to new ideas, who enjoys the process of new information coming in and old ideas going out.
The government is afraid of its citizens, primarily because we're armed. In an ideal world, it would be because we were fit, well-informed, assertive, and holding our government accountable, but that unfortunately is not the case. Fast food, obesity, drug and alcohol abuse, passive lifestyles, a dearth of credible news sources, obsession with sports teams and other distractions, and debt and its ensuing stress have made the vast majority of Americans feeble shadows of the proud nation of doers and dreamers they were 60 or more years ago.
The government knows that it does not have enough troops to police the entire country, especially as we're fighting wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, and have more than 170 bases around the world. So the government and corporate media are doing whatever they can to portray gun owners and Second Amendment advocates as dangerous and crazy.
Add to this mix the news I received from a friend whose brother was the captain of a ship in the U.S. Navy and is still working as a Navy consultant. The brother said that a few years back, military personnel were posed with the question: Would you fire upon American citizens if ordered to do so? Eighty percent said "no." First off, why was the government asking this question unless it has plans to do so. And, two, don't breathe easy because 80 percent said they wouldn't. That, in my mind, is why illegals are now granted citizenship after serving in the U.S. military. The government needs to get as many people in its military who have no connection with U.S. history or any kind of feeling for what it means to be an American. I seriously doubt if many recent immigrants, legal or illegal, have a dewdrop in their eyes when they think of Thomas Jefferson or Lewis and Clark. And governments know that soldiers do not want to fire upon their countrymen. Remember Tian an Men Square? The soldiers who mowed down student protesters were not from Beijing. The Chinese government called in troops from distant provinces to do the dirty work. So what's to say foreign-born troops aren't being trained to fire on Americans in the event of social unrest?
Also recall that we are now using more military contractors (aka mercenaries) in Iraq than we are U.S. troops, that the infamous Blackwater, now known as Xe, was used in New Orleans to "police" the populace after Katrina, and that several U.S. cities have already contracted with Blackwater to control citizens in the event of civil unrest. And remember what Blackwater has done in Iraq, shooting civilians for no reason other than it felt good. Also that Blackwater is comprised of work-for-hire gunman from war-torn, impoverished countries in Africa and eastern Europe, people who could care less if they killed Americans.
Of course, there are also other means that could be used: predator drones and UN troops, some of which have been training on U.S. soil. Wouldn't it be ironic if the Americans who didn't give a hoot about the civilians we are murdering with drones in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan--saying that it saves the lives of American troops--would be murdered by drones that are piloted by American troops?
To add still another layer to this evil, more and more is being written about how this economic disaster has been orchestrated, that it was intentional, in order to destroy the American system and issue in a new currency. In fact, the $3 trillion wars we're currently fighting are a fantastic means to bring about our ruin. Bringing down the U.S. is one of the last agenda items in the march toward one world government.
These bastards are so ingenious, getting taxpayers to fund their own enslavement and annhilation. Brilliant!
I'm not rushing out to buy a gun, but I certainly can understand why people are doing so. The government is not to be trusted, I've known that since the mid-1980s, when I began to look into CIA"s cocaine-gun running.
The most important thing is to be informed but not afraid. Fear is what the powers that be want. Fear means control, and I will not be controlled. Now is the time to understand the evil that is at the core of business and government but to keep one's own house in order, delighting in the beauty that surrounds you in every moment and knowing that you are far more than the little body you are currently inhabiting.
First off, let me state that I have never been a gun owner. I have always felt that guns caused more problems than they solved. But I am also a person whose mind is open to new ideas, who enjoys the process of new information coming in and old ideas going out.
The government is afraid of its citizens, primarily because we're armed. In an ideal world, it would be because we were fit, well-informed, assertive, and holding our government accountable, but that unfortunately is not the case. Fast food, obesity, drug and alcohol abuse, passive lifestyles, a dearth of credible news sources, obsession with sports teams and other distractions, and debt and its ensuing stress have made the vast majority of Americans feeble shadows of the proud nation of doers and dreamers they were 60 or more years ago.
The government knows that it does not have enough troops to police the entire country, especially as we're fighting wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, and have more than 170 bases around the world. So the government and corporate media are doing whatever they can to portray gun owners and Second Amendment advocates as dangerous and crazy.
Add to this mix the news I received from a friend whose brother was the captain of a ship in the U.S. Navy and is still working as a Navy consultant. The brother said that a few years back, military personnel were posed with the question: Would you fire upon American citizens if ordered to do so? Eighty percent said "no." First off, why was the government asking this question unless it has plans to do so. And, two, don't breathe easy because 80 percent said they wouldn't. That, in my mind, is why illegals are now granted citizenship after serving in the U.S. military. The government needs to get as many people in its military who have no connection with U.S. history or any kind of feeling for what it means to be an American. I seriously doubt if many recent immigrants, legal or illegal, have a dewdrop in their eyes when they think of Thomas Jefferson or Lewis and Clark. And governments know that soldiers do not want to fire upon their countrymen. Remember Tian an Men Square? The soldiers who mowed down student protesters were not from Beijing. The Chinese government called in troops from distant provinces to do the dirty work. So what's to say foreign-born troops aren't being trained to fire on Americans in the event of social unrest?
Also recall that we are now using more military contractors (aka mercenaries) in Iraq than we are U.S. troops, that the infamous Blackwater, now known as Xe, was used in New Orleans to "police" the populace after Katrina, and that several U.S. cities have already contracted with Blackwater to control citizens in the event of civil unrest. And remember what Blackwater has done in Iraq, shooting civilians for no reason other than it felt good. Also that Blackwater is comprised of work-for-hire gunman from war-torn, impoverished countries in Africa and eastern Europe, people who could care less if they killed Americans.
Of course, there are also other means that could be used: predator drones and UN troops, some of which have been training on U.S. soil. Wouldn't it be ironic if the Americans who didn't give a hoot about the civilians we are murdering with drones in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan--saying that it saves the lives of American troops--would be murdered by drones that are piloted by American troops?
To add still another layer to this evil, more and more is being written about how this economic disaster has been orchestrated, that it was intentional, in order to destroy the American system and issue in a new currency. In fact, the $3 trillion wars we're currently fighting are a fantastic means to bring about our ruin. Bringing down the U.S. is one of the last agenda items in the march toward one world government.
These bastards are so ingenious, getting taxpayers to fund their own enslavement and annhilation. Brilliant!
I'm not rushing out to buy a gun, but I certainly can understand why people are doing so. The government is not to be trusted, I've known that since the mid-1980s, when I began to look into CIA"s cocaine-gun running.
The most important thing is to be informed but not afraid. Fear is what the powers that be want. Fear means control, and I will not be controlled. Now is the time to understand the evil that is at the core of business and government but to keep one's own house in order, delighting in the beauty that surrounds you in every moment and knowing that you are far more than the little body you are currently inhabiting.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)